BewareCare NZ is a privately funded Consumer Advocacy campaign that has three primary aims:
1/ To publically expose the rampant “open season” upon the vulnerable elderly who are being financially groomed and abused by Caregivers in New Zealand;
2/ To lobby Government to create meaningful protective factors for this vulnerable population who are being financially groomed and abused by Caregivers;
3/ To encourage the NZ legal system to enforce meaningful sanctions against Caregivers who commit acts of such financial grooming and abuse against this vulnerable population.
BewareCare NZ will also act as an online Information Clearing House, where families are able to tell their stories, comment on other peoples stories, and share helpful resources and information with each other.
To contact BewareCare NZ, please go to the “Contact” page.
Content Moderation Policy:
Anyone who may be concerned about the accuracy or content of a particular post at BewareCare NZ may contact BewareCare NZ to request corrections, amendments, or retractions, as long as it can be substantiated that any content within a post contains materially inaccurate information.
“This is a once-only second chance,” barrister Maria Dew QC said in the report.
However, the Nursing Council is reinvestigating the case after her employer came forward saying she never disclosed her criminal convictions.
The nurse, Ashwani Lal, has been working as a medical receptionist at Papakura-based medical centre, The Wood Street Doctors, since September last year.
The HPDT report said Lal had disclosed her theft convictions to her current employer but the medical centre’s practice manager told the Herald that was not true.
“We were totally shocked when we read the article,” said the manager, who spoke on the condition her named wasn’t used.
She said management couldn’t be sure if it was a “weird coincidence” that their employee had the same name, was also from South Auckland, and was also working as a medical receptionist so they contacted the Nursing Council.
“We didn’t want to accuse her without knowing for sure.”
“The council is The Nursing Council’s deputy registrar Clare Prendergast told the Herald the council investigating the issues.
Lal told the Herald she didn’t tell her employer because she had been trying to get a job for the past five years and was having no luck.
“I was scared.”
She said after the Herald story was published her employer asked if it was her and she said it wasn’t.
“I told them it wasn’t me, it was just someone with the same name as me. I was scared. The next day I told them the truth,” she said.
Before the story came out, Lal had resigned from The Wood Street Doctors after being offered a job at Blockhouse Bay Medical Centre. Her last day is today.
But the Blockhouse Bay centre has since rescinded her job offer. The Herald contacted the centre for comment but they declined, saying it was a “confidential employment matter”.
Employment law expert Blair Scotland said under New Zealand law an employee or an applicant did not have to disclose criminal convictions unless the employer asked.
“I always encourage employers to do a free Ministry of Justice criminal history check. ‘Trust but verify’,” Scotland said.
When the Herald asked the practice manager at The Wood Street Doctors why they didn’t ask about criminal convictions, she said: “We didn’t want to judge, she told us she was sick and really needed a job so we gave her one.”
The tribunal report also said Lal’s current employer provided a reference to the tribunal – but the practice manager said that they hadn’t.
Lal said her previous employer, East Tamaki Healthcare, who provided the reference.
East Tamaki Healthcare did not respond to a request for comment.
In 2016, Lal was working as a nurse at Pukekohe Rehabilitation and Care Unit when she stole the patient’s credit card to pay $1226.14 in power bills in 2016. On a separate occasion, she stole a colleague’s debit card to pay off $291.93 worth of phone and power bills.
She was convicted for two offences of dishonesty and sentenced to 100 hours of community service and ordered to pay $1558.07 reparation to the victims.
The HPDT report said Lal has not held an Annual Practising Certificate since then and has been working for two employers as a medical practice receptionist.
“These roles have involved liaising with patients, general administrative tasks and managing payments, cash and banking,” the decision said.
The HPDT report said Lal expressed to the tribunal her strong desire to return to clinical practice and that she was willing to accept any supervision and conditions it might impose.
She said she had reflected on her ethical obligations under the Nursing Council’s Code of Conduct and wanted to earn back trust and respect.
She would be willing to share her experiences and learnings about trust, integrity and honesty with other trainee nurses. She also hoped eventually to upskill to become a registered nurse.